Download
← All fact checksAfternoon run · October 22, 2026 · #3 by reach
PoliticsOtherEvent claim

Did the Irish government release an ad urging grandparents for consent before hugging?

Did the Irish government release an ad urging grandparents to ask for consent before hugging their grandchildren?

Misleading

Irish government did not release the ad, despite implications.

The claim is misleading as the Irish government did not release the ad; it was produced by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre under the We-Consent initiative.

+1Sources ↓Original post ↗

Claims

1 checked

The Irish government released a new ad urging grandparents to ask for consent before hugging their grandchildren.123

~ MisleadingCentral claimHigh confidence

The post implies that the Irish government was responsible for an advertisement that encouraged grandparents to seek consent before hugging their grandchildren. However, the advertisement was created by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre as part of their We-Consent initiative. The Department of Justice stated that it was not a government advertising campaign. The actual marketing was removed after receiving significant criticism from the public. Since official sources clarify that the government did not produce the ad, the claim's wording is misleading.

A text-only post: there was no media to test.

What was posted

X

The post on Twitter describes a supposed new advertisement urging grandparents to ask for consent before hugging their grandchildren. It lacks context around authorship.

“JUST IN: Irish government releases new ad urging grandparents to ask for consent before hugging their grandchildren.”

Who posted it

X
@polymarket

2M followers · Account 6 years old

View the account on X ↗

Account check

Looks like a genuine account90%
Likelihood of automation10%

Estimates from public signals — account age, posting pattern, audience — not a judgement of the person behind the account, and separate from whether this post is true.

What stood out

  • The Twitter account @Polymarket is the official social media presence of Polymarket, a cryptocurrency-based prediction market platform founded in 2020 by Shayne Coplan.
  • The account has over 2 million followers and over 7,000 listed posts, indicating significant engagement and activity.
  • The account's Twitter Score is 764 out of 1000, ranking it in the top 0.1% of crypto-related accounts, suggesting high credibility and authenticity.
  • The account is not verified on Twitter, which is common for company accounts and does not necessarily indicate inauthenticity.
  • The account's bio states: 'The World's Largest Prediction Market. Trade politics, news, crypto, sports, & more.'
  • The account has been active since May 2020, aligning with the company's founding date.
  • The account's follower count and engagement metrics are consistent with those of a major company in the cryptocurrency and prediction market space.
Signals (2)+
Posting cadence
High
Notable news coverage
Polymarket receives up to $2 billion investment from Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange. ([axios.com](https://www.axios.com/2025/10/07/polymarket-new-york-stock-exchange?utm_source=openai)); New York sues Polymarket, alleging unlicensed gambling operations. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/b75b753e3c3cd069cdf8d6af175c9fbb?utm_source=openai))

Account checked October 22, 2026, 14:52 UTC

Sources

4 sources reviewed

Further reading

The full story

The controversy originates from a short video produced as part of the We-Consent initiative by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre (DRCC), which featured a message encouraging parents and grandparents to ask for permission before hugging children. The video, posted on social media, provoked substantial public backlash, leading to its removal shortly after its release on October 22, 2026. Importantly, the Department of Justice later confirmed that while the We-Consent campaign was supported by the government, the videos were not produced or formally endorsed as a government advertisement. This distinction is vital, as it means claims suggesting that the Irish government released or was responsible for the messaging of the ad misrepresents the situation. The video provoked intense feelings and highlighted conversations surrounding consent, but the government played no direct role in its creation.

How it was framed

False connection

The phrasing implies a connection that does not exist, as the ad was not released by the governing body.

  • Emotional language. The use of terms like 'urge' creates a sense of urgency and importance.
  • Selective evidence. Focus on the ad’s intent rather than its origin misguides the audience.

Bias

NoneSlightModerateStrong

The caption uses a 'JUST IN' framing and presents the ad as an official government release, which sensationalises government involvement and could lead readers to assume direct government authorship rather than an independent NGO-produced video supported or funded in part.

Bias describes how the post frames its message — the slant of the language, selection and emphasis — and is judged separately from whether the claim is true. A true claim can still be framed with a strong slant.

How we checked

54 s
  1. 1

    Searched for reports and articles about the claimed advertisement.

  2. 2

    Consulted independent news sources for confirmation.

  3. 3

    Investigated statements from the Department of Justice related to the ad.

  4. 4

    Reviewed the publication dates and context of news articles confirming the event.

✓ Claim checked– Media not applicable✓ Sources checked

Why 80% confidence

High

We have high confidence in the verdict due to strong corroboration from multiple independent news articles confirming the source and context of the claim.

Limits. We could not access any official documents or government statements directly to confirm the advertisement's funding.

Spot it yourself

Spot the fake

Looks suspicious, isn’t proof

  • The caption uses language that exaggerates government involvement.
  • The tone may seem alarmist without clear context.
  • No credible government or official document supports the claim.
  • The claim lacked supporting evidence from authorities at the time.

The actual evidence

  • Independent reports confirm the ad was not government-funded.
  • Official statements from the Department of Justice clarify the video's origin.
  • The video's removal indicates issues surrounding its reception, contrasting the posted claim.
  1. 1

    Verify the original source of the advertisement.

    Check statements from official sources like government websites or reputable news outlets.

  2. 2

    Look for press releases or official statements.

    See if a government agency has formally released the ad.

  3. 3

    Scrutinize the wording in claims.

    Analyze whether the language used implies greater authority involvement than what exists.

  4. 4

    Research public reactions.

    Find articles covering public opinion or backlash to clarify context.

Takeaway

Not everything that sounds like it should be legit is official. Always verify who really produced information before sharing it.

Questions people ask

Was the consent ad actually from the Irish government?+

No, the ad was not produced by the Irish government but by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre as part of their We-Consent campaign.

What is the We-Consent initiative?+

The We-Consent initiative is a campaign by the Dublin Rape Crisis Centre aimed at raising awareness about consent and preventing harm.

Why was the video removed?+

The video faced backlash for its messaging and was taken down for review following public criticism.

What does the Department of Justice say about the ad?+

The Department of Justice clarified that the video was not a government advertisement and criticized its messaging.

How should I check claims like these?+

Verify information by researching the source and context of the claim, checking official statements, and analyzing language for potential manipulation.

Go deeper

Misinformation
False or misleading information shared without harmful intent.
Disinformation
False information shared with the intent to deceive.
Public service announcement
An advertisement aimed at raising public awareness on social issues.
Consent
Permission or agreement for something to happen, particularly relevant in interpersonal interactions.

People also search for

Irish government hugs consent adDo grandparents need consent to hug in IrelandWe-Consent campaign grandparents huggingDublin Rape Crisis Centre ad backlashIreland government ad grandparents consent
For educators+
Misinformation vs. disinformationThe role of emotional language in messagingHow public backlash can influence media content
  • How can language influence public perception about initiatives like the We-Consent campaign?
  • What steps should be taken to critically analyze claims from social media?
  • Why is it important to understand the origins of content before sharing it?

About this check

Platform
X
Posted by
@polymarket
Posted
October 21, 2026
Age when checked
Under 24 hours old when checked
Where it spread
Ireland
Audience
International audience
Language
EN
Status
● Post is live
Verified
October 22, 2026, 14:54 UTC
Published
October 22, 2026, 14:54 UTC

Reach. Polymarket post 3,023 likes; @europa version 6,732 likes; @PrisonPlanet 4,621 likes (X syndication API, checked 2026-10-22). TheJournal says the video was picked up by conservative commentators globally and covered by the New York Post; ad pulled 22 Oct after Justice Minister intervened

This verdict was generated with AI from the sources shown. AI can make mistakes — check the sources before relying on it.

Check anything yourself, in seconds.

Share any social post or video to What the Fact and get the verdict, the confidence, and the receipts.

Download on theApp StoreGet it onGoogle Play