What did a voter report about an Illinois voting machine message?
Did a voting machine in suburban Cook County, Illinois, show a 'People are not typically choosing this person!' warning when a voter picked Republican judicial candidates?
Misleading
The claim about the voting machine is misleading.
A voter claimed her machine said 'people are not typically choosing this person' after selecting Republican judges. Officials and fact-checkers state this claim is misleading because machines do not show such popularity messages.
GenuineClaims
✓ 1 true"When I selected a Republican judge I got a notification on the bar that said, 'People are not typically choosing this person!'"125
“"Cuando seleccioné a una juez republicana, recibí una notificación en la barra que decía, '¡Las personas no suelen elegir a esta persona!'"”
The claim is unverified due to the lack of independent confirmation of the exact message shown on the voting machine. Officials state that such messages do not exist, indicating a possible misinterpretation of standard prompts, often found when contests are not fully filled out. The claim relies solely on a personal account that lacks further corroboration.
This is election rigging / the voting equipment is rigged.12
“Esto es un fraude electoral / el equipo de votación está amañado.”
The assertion regarding election rigging is misleading due to the absence of evidence showing the machines influence votes or display actual candidate-popularity information. Both election officials and fact-checkers assert that such claims are false, classifying them as hoaxes.
Cook County uses Dominion Voting Systems equipment.34
“El Condado de Cook utiliza el equipo de Dominion Voting Systems.”
This claim is confirmed as true, given that Cook County has a contract with Dominion Voting Systems for their election equipment, critical documentation supports the use of this specific voting technology.
What was posted
XThe video post on Twitter features a voter discussing her experience while using a touchscreen voting machine in Cook County, Illinois. She claims to have received a notification about candidate popularity after voting for Republican judges.
“HOLY CR*P 🚨 American went to vote in Illinois, she says when selecting the conservative candidate the screen displays a message that says 'people are not typically choosing this person, exclamation mark'”
Who posted it
XAccount check
Estimates from public signals — account age, posting pattern, audience — not a judgement of the person behind the account, and separate from whether this post is true.
What stood out
- Account joined Twitter in February 2019, indicating a relatively recent creation.
- Profile description includes phrases like 'We Are The Resistance' and 'Unfiltered Breaking News', suggesting a focus on controversial or unverified content.
- Account has 1.4 million followers and 52,000 tweets, indicating high activity and reach.
- Account is followed by notable figures such as Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, and Donald Trump Jr., which may influence its credibility.
- Content includes political commentary and critiques of mainstream media, often presenting unverified claims as facts.
Signals (3)+
- Posting cadence
- 18.8
- Follower ratio
- 0
- Notable news coverage
- Elon Musk; Joe Rogan; Donald Trump Jr.
Account checked October 24, 2026, 02:59 UTC
The media
Video✓ What is genuine
The video appears to show a genuine firsthand account of a voter's experience.
The tells
- ●●● Strong signal Selfie-style recording may suggest authenticity.our visual review
Synthetic-media detector
Detector ranThe claim stands or falls on whether the media is real, so the detector ran.
Scores are the detector’s estimate for the file as uploaded. A low score does not rule out editing, a spliced caption, or footage shown out of context — those are judged above. Model v3.
How we checked the media
- Visual review confirmed no signs of manipulation in the video.
- Media evaluation assessed authenticity using detection tools, showing no AI generation.
Sources
5 sources reviewed- 1Illinois elections board calls viral voting machine allegation ‘hoax’ ↗
AOL (reporting The Center Square) · aol.comUntiereduntiered — treated as signal only, never decisiveEvidence
Illinois election officials rejected the notion of biased voting equipment.
- 2POLICY WIRE FACT CHECK: Viral Claims of 'Biased' Voting Machines in Cook County Debunked ↗
Policy Wire · policy-wire.comUntiereduntiered — treated as signal only, never decisiveEvidence
Fact-checking confirmed the claim about voting machines was misleading.
- 3Cook County Board - Proposed Contract: Authorization for County Clerk to purchase Dominion equipment (2018) ↗
Cook County Legistar / official county record · cook-county.legistar.comUntiereduntiered — treated as signal only, never decisiveEvidence
Documentation of the contract awarded to Dominion Voting Systems by Cook County.
- 4Are Illinois’ New Voting Machines Safer Than Paper Ballots? ↗
GovTech · govtech.comUntiereduntiered — treated as signal only, never decisiveContext
Provides background on the Dominion equipment used in Cook County.
- 5Cook County, IL: voter reports a touchscreen message, 'People are not typically choosing this person!', during early voting (monitor entry) ↗
Handcount Roadshow — Election Issues Monitor · monitor.handcountroadshow.orgUntiereduntiered — treated as signal only, never decisiveEvidence
Logs confirming the original claim of the voter regarding the touchscreen message.
Further reading
- 1AOL (reporting The Center Square) This source provides a statement from election officials about the viral claim, dismissing it as a hoax.
- 2Policy Wire Offers a thorough fact-check assessment that categorizes the claim as misleading.
- 3Cook County Legistar / official county record Contains information about Cook County's contract with Dominion Voting Systems.
The full story
On October 19, 2026, a voter in Streamwood, Cook County, Illinois, shared a video claiming that a touchscreen voting machine prompted her that 'people are not typically choosing this person' after she selected Republican judges. This assertion sparked viral attention, purportedly indicating voter influence or 'rigging.' However, both Cook County and Illinois election officials stated that the machines are not programmed to show such popularity messages, and they characterized the claim as misleading. The officials indicated that these machines produce standard undervote prompts when selections do not meet ballot requirements but do not provide feedback on candidate popularity. This viral claim illustrates concerns about perceived backdoor election manipulations, particularly regarding confidence in electronic voting systems, which have been scrutinized in past elections.
Timeline
October 19, 2026
A voter in Streamwood, IL, reports a touchscreen message during early voting.
October 21, 2026
Cook County Clerk releases statements addressing the viral claim as false. 1AOL (reporting The Center Square)
October 22, 2026
Fact-checkers publish findings categorizing the claim as misleading. 2Policy Wire
How it was framed
The claim selectively utilizes true elements (the existence of voting machines and their location in Cook County) to draw an unsupported and misleading conclusion about the functionality and behavior of the voting machines.
- Emotional language. The video uses emotionally charged phrases like "election rigging" which may influence viewer perceptions.
- Urgency. The call to share the video quickly frames the situation as urgent.
The video originates from a personal account claiming voter experience during early voting in Cook County, IL.
Bias
Leans anti-election-technology / suggests 'rigged' outcome. The video frames a routine voting experience as evidence of deliberate manipulation, promoting distrust in election equipment without corroborating evidence.
Bias describes how the post frames its message — the slant of the language, selection and emphasis — and is judged separately from whether the claim is true. A true claim can still be framed with a strong slant.
How we checked
1 min 47 s- 1
We reviewed the video for authenticity using visual assessment methods.
- 2
We searched for official statements from Cook County election officials about machine warnings.
- 3
We looked for documentation from independent fact-checkers to substantiate claims.
✓ Claim checked✓ Media checked✓ Sources checked
Why 78% confidence
HighThe evidence is categorized as HIGH confidence due to the clear statements from election officials denying the claim and the absence of other credible sources supporting it.
Limits. No machine logs or screenshots were found to confirm the specific wording of the alleged message.
What we don’t know
- The exact wording of messages displayed on the voting machines during the voter's experience.
- If any other voters reported similar experiences with the machines.
- Potential technical malfunctions that could affect machine messaging during voting.
Spot it yourself
Spot the fakeLooks suspicious, isn’t proof
- The automated warning claim is alarming but unverified.
- The personal narrative format can evoke emotional responses that cloud fact-checking.
- No independent evidence backs the bold assertion.
The actual evidence
- Election officials definitively state that machines do not show candidate popularity messages.
- Fact-checkers categorize the claim as misleading based on routine deficiencies.
- No corroborative logs or screenshots proving the message exist.
- 1
Investigate the source of any alarming election-related claims.
Look for statements from official election bodies.
- 2
Check for independent media coverage of the incident.
Search news outlets for reports on viral claims.
- 3
Explore fact-checking websites that specialize in electoral integrity.
Visit sites like Snopes or FactCheck.org for verified reports.
Takeaway
Always verify claims related to voting through reliable sources and independent measures to ensure informed opinions.
Questions people ask
Do voting machines display messages about candidate popularity?+
No, officials state that voting machines do not provide feedback on candidate selections or popularity; they only show standard prompts during the voting process.
What should I do if I witness something suspicious at a voting machine?+
Report your observations to election officials in your area immediately to ensure they are addressed appropriately.
How do officials verify claims made about voting irregularities?+
Officials often investigate through logs, voter reports, and machine audits to ensure the election process remains transparent and credible.
Go deeper
- Undervote
- A situation where a voter does not select a candidate for a position in an election.
- Fact-checking
- The process of verifying information to ensure its accuracy.
- Election rigging
- Manipulating election results, often through dishonest means or methods.
People also search for
For educators+
- What role does social media play in shaping public perception of elections?
- How can voters better discern reliable information about electoral processes?
About this check
- Platform
- X
- Posted by
- @wallstreetapes
- Posted
- October 20, 2026
- Age when checked
- Older post, still live
- Where it spread
- United States
- Audience
- US audience
- Language
- EN
- Status
- ● Post is live
- Verified
- October 24, 2026, 03:01 UTC
- Published
- October 24, 2026, 03:01 UTC
Reach. 72,856 likes on @WallStreetApes post (X syndication); @TheSCIF 6,127 likes; @DerrickEvans4WV 5,229 likes; X trending topic 'Cook County Voter Spots Unusual Message on Dominion Voting Machine'; Illinois State Board of Elections called it a 'hoax' 23 Oct (Center Square), Snopes 23 Oct, AFP via Yahoo 2
This verdict was generated with AI from the sources shown. AI can make mistakes — check the sources before relying on it.
Check anything yourself, in seconds.
Share any social post or video to What the Fact and get the verdict, the confidence, and the receipts.