Download
← All fact checksAfternoon run · October 30, 2026 · #9 by reach
PoliticsCrimeEvent claim

Did Giorgia Meloni call the Milan judge's decision on Youssef Siher's arrest "shameful"?

Was Youssef Siher accused of running the Telegram page that organised the Milan riots, as Giorgia Meloni said when calling the judge's decision to free him 'shameful'?

True, but…

The ruling and the video are real; her claim the Telegram channel incited the Milan riots is not.

Genuine. On 28 October 2026 Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni posted a video on her own X account calling the Milan judge's ruling on Youssef Siher "a shameful decision". The judge, Tiziana Landoni, did refuse to validate Siher's arrest and freed him. But Meloni's claim that his "Movimento 17 ottobre" Telegram channel incited the Milan riots is false: the channel was created after them.

+5Sources ↓Original post ↗
Genuine
The post as it circulated, labelled by our media check.Video · 0:49 · 522×928

Claims

✓ 2 true · ✕ 1 false

The Milan judge for preliminary investigations declined to validate the arrest of Youssef Siher.1458

“Considero vergognosa la decisione del GIP di Milano di non convalidare l'arresto di Youssef Sihir.”

✓ TrueCentral claimHigh confidence

This is the part of the post that everyone can check, and it holds. Judge Tiziana Landoni, sitting as GIP in Milan, did not validate the arrest (fermo) of Youssef Siher and rejected the prosecution's request for pre-trial detention, ordering his immediate release from San Vittore on 28 October 2026. The fact is reported in the same terms by several outlets with different owners and editorial lines: the ANSA wire, Sky TG24, Il Post, Il Sole 24 Ore and Agenzia Nova, plus Corriere della Sera on Siher leaving prison. These are independent of one another: they all trace back to the same court order, but each would have had to reproduce it or report from the courthouse to publish, so the order's existence and its effect are not in doubt. What a reader should weigh is that the outlets agree on the ruling, not on whether it was right. A judge's decision can be disputed politically; whether the decision happened is a matter of record.

Siher is accused of being the administrator of the Telegram page "Movimento 17 ottobre".478

“Youssef Sihir, accusato di essere il gestore della pagina Telegram Movimento 17 ottobre”

✓ TrueHigh confidence

Meloni's description of the charge matches what prosecutors in Milan formally allege. Siher is accused of administering the "Movimento 17 ottobre" Telegram group and its Instagram page, with charges of incitement to crime aggravated by terrorism purposes and organised violence at public demonstrations. Two independent reports — Il Post's account of the release and Agenzia Nova's transcription of the video alongside the prosecution's case — set out the accusation in these terms. The distinction worth holding on to is between accusation and finding. Being charged is not being convicted, and in this case the judge went the other way, concluding there was no serious evidence of the alleged offences and that Siher's posts promoted protest and civil disobedience rather than violence, as Corriere della Sera reported. So the claim is accurate as a description of the charge, and the post is not wrong to call him the accused administrator. Readers sometimes treat "accused of" and "guilty of" as the same word in political speech; they are not.

The "Movimento 17 ottobre" Telegram page incited the demonstrations that led to the devastation of several shops in Milan.2348

“cioè la pagina che incitava all'organizzazione di quelle manifestazioni che poi abbiamo visto portare alla devastazione di diversi esercizi commerciali a Milano”

✕ FalseCentral claimHigh confidence

This is where the post falls down, and the decisive evidence is a timestamp. L'Espresso documented that the "Movimento 17 ottobre" Telegram group was created at 19:58 on Sunday 18 October 2026 — after the 17 October march and after the looting and devastation of that weekend. A channel opened on the evening of the 18th cannot have incited a demonstration held on the 17th. Independently, prosecutors themselves did not hold Siher responsible for the 17-18 October disorders, and the judge's reasoning, as reported by Corriere della Sera, was that his posts never called for violent action. Il Post's account of the release carries the same creation time. The strongest confirmation comes from Meloni's own side: La Stampa reported that, when a journalist pointed out the channel had opened only after the clashes, she conceded she had "got a verb tense wrong", having said "hanno portato" (they led to) rather than "avevano portato" (they had led to). L'Espresso is a single outlet on the timeline point, which is why we do not rest on it alone; the prosecution's own case and the Prime Minister's concession point the same way.

Still open: We have not seen the underlying platform data behind the 19:58 creation time; our confidence rests on its publication by L'Espresso and its consistency with the prosecution's own case and Meloni's concession.

The judge's ruling amounts to an unbearable undermining of the work of police, investigators and the Interior Ministry, and a "shameful decision".16

“Penso che questa sia una mortificazione insopportabile del lavoro delle forze dell'ordine, degli inquirenti, del Ministero degli Interni”

– OpinionHigh confidence

Words like "shameful" and "unbearable undermining" are value judgements, not checkable facts. Whether a ruling demeans police work is a political argument, and reasonable people land on different sides. What can be checked is how the institutions concerned responded, and they did respond. Il Sole 24 Ore reported that the president of the Milan tribunal, Fabio Roia, and Vincenza Maccora called the statements "inadmissible" (irricevibili). ANSA reported that the magistrates' association, the ANM, described the criticism as an "unbalanced attack" and the "customary exercise of intimidation" against judges. Those are also opinions, but they are institutional opinions on the record, which is what separates a documented political row from an unsourced assertion. A reader weighing this claim should treat the ruling itself as fact, the Prime Minister's characterisation as argument, and the tribunal's reaction as the documented consequence — and should not expect a fact-check to settle which of two political readings is correct.

What was posted

X

A selfie-style video posted to Giorgia Meloni's own verified X account on 28 October 2026, the day the Milan judge's order became public. Speaking to camera, the Prime Minister criticises the judge's refusal to validate the arrest of Youssef Siher and frames it as an attack on the police and the Interior Ministry. The caption carries the same message in three words.

“Una decisione vergognosa”

“A shameful decision” — translated

Posted from Meloni's own verified X account on 28 October 2026; the same remarks were transcribed that day by news agencies and outlets including ANSA and Agenzia Nova.

Who posted it

X
@giorgiameloni
View the account on X ↗

Account check

Looks like a genuine account86%
Likelihood of automation5%

Estimates from public signals — account age, posting pattern, audience — not a judgement of the person behind the account, and separate from whether this post is true.

What stood out

  • @GiorgiaMeloni is the long-standing official X account of Italy's Prime Minister; major outlets (RTRS, Vijesti.ba, Times Now, GreekReporter) quote it directly, including posts dated 29–30 Oct 2026.
  • Account has been the vehicle for official government communications since at least 2014 (Il Post) and through her 2022 swearing-in, i.e. a multi-year, continuous institutional presence.
  • In May 2026 the account publicly debunked AI deepfake images of Meloni and urged users to 'verify before believing' — a pro-verification, anti-misinformation behaviour.
  • No evidence found of impersonation, suspension, or a distinct parody/satire account operating at this exact handle.
  • Provided metadata is anomalously empty (no bio, no follower count, no posts) and isplatformverified is recorded as false, which contradicts the real account's known verified status — likely a scraper/data-collection gap rather than a clone.
  • Caveat: as a serving head of government the account is inherently political/partisan in framing, though its factual claims are attributable official statements.
  • No signals of automated or coordinated posting; cadence matches a staff-run institutional communications account.
Signals (7)+
Identity match
Matches official account of Italian PM Giorgia Meloni
Notable news coverage
Quoted as source by international outlets through Oct 2026
Fact check history
Self-debunked viral AI deepfakes (May 2026); promotes pre-bunking guidance
Posting cadence
Institutional, event-driven; no spam/automation indicators
Follower ratio
Not provided in metadata
Recent posts sample
Empty — no content to analyse
Affiliation
Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri, Italy (Fratelli d'Italia)

Account checked October 30, 2026, 15:12 UTC

The media

Video
GenuinePresented as real footage

✓ What is genuine

The footage itself: a real selfie-style address by Giorgia Meloni, published on her own verified account on 28 October 2026. Nothing in the clip was altered; what is wrong is one of the things she says in it.

The tells

  • ●●○ Supporting signal The frames show a consistent office setting — the same paintings and flags behind her — with no flicker, morphing or distorted hands and facial features between frames.our visual review
  • ●●● Strong signal News agencies transcribed the same remarks from a video published on her social channels the same day, word for word.ANSA and Agenzia Nova
  • ●●● Strong signal The clip sits on Meloni's own verified X account, which is the account the post links to.our review of the post

Synthetic-media detector

Detector not consulted

The media is incidental to the claim; the detector was not needed.

How we checked the media

  • Reviewed frames from the clip by eye, looking at setting, lighting, facial consistency and background.
  • Compared the claim in the clip with the same-day transcriptions published by ANSA and Agenzia Nova.
  • Checked that the clip appeared on Meloni's own verified X account rather than only on third-party reposts.

Sources

8 sources reviewed

Further reading

  • 2L'Espresso The clearest documentation of the Telegram group's 19:58 creation time and how it undermines the causal claim.
  • 3La Stampa The Prime Minister's own concession about the verb tense, which is the strongest support for the false-chronology finding.
  • 8Corriere della Sera Sets out the judge's reasoning on why Siher's posts did not amount to incitement to violence.
  • 6Il Sole 24 ORE Documents the Milan tribunal's "inadmissible" response and the language Meloni used in the video.

The full story

The kernel of truth here is a court decision. On 28 October 2026 the judge for preliminary investigations in Milan, Tiziana Landoni, declined to validate the arrest of Youssef Siher, a 30-year-old researcher accused of running the "Movimento 17 ottobre" Telegram and Instagram channels. She also rejected the prosecution's request to keep him in custody, and he left San Vittore that day. Her reasoning, as reported by Corriere della Sera, was that his posts promoted protest and civil disobedience but never called for violence and did not evoke the disorders of 17 and 18 October 2026.

That ruling is what the Prime Minister's video is about, and it is real. So is the political storm that followed: the Milan tribunal called her comments "inadmissible" and the magistrates' association called them an "unbalanced attack". In a country where tension between the government and parts of the judiciary is a standing political theme, a prime minister denouncing a judge's decision is a story, not a fabrication.

The false step is the causal chain she builds on top of it. The Telegram group she describes as inciting the demonstrations was, according to L'Espresso and Il Post, opened at 19:58 on the evening of Sunday 18 October — after the marches and after the shop looting. Prosecutors did not blame Siher for that weekend's violence either. Pressed on the point by a journalist, Meloni told La Stampa she had "got a verb tense wrong".

That is why this post is filed as true but: a genuine video, a genuine ruling, and one sentence that reverses the order of events and changes the argument.

Kernel of truth

A Milan judge did refuse to validate Youssef Siher's arrest and released him, and the Prime Minister did publicly call that decision shameful.

Timeline

  1. October 17, 2026

    March in Milan during the weekend of protests that saw looting and devastation of several shops; the date gives the "Movimento 17 ottobre" channels their name. 2L'Espresso

  2. October 18, 2026

    The "Movimento 17 ottobre" Telegram group is created at 19:58 on the Sunday evening, after the weekend's clashes and devastation. 2L'Espresso

  3. October 28, 2026

    GIP Tiziana Landoni does not validate Youssef Siher's arrest and rejects the custody request; he leaves San Vittore. Meloni posts her video calling the decision shameful. 4Il Post

  4. October 28, 2026

    The Milan tribunal's leadership calls the statements "inadmissible"; the magistrates' association describes them as an "unbalanced attack". 6Il Sole 24 ORE

  5. October 29, 2026

    La Stampa reports Meloni conceding to a journalist that she had "got a verb tense wrong" about the demonstrations and the devastation. 3La Stampa

How it was framed

False contextMisleading content

The video and the ruling it discusses are genuine; the false element is the context Meloni attaches to the Telegram channel, presenting it as the spark for riots that had already happened when it was created. The broader effect is to frame a judicial decision as the cause of unrest it did not cause.

  • Emotional language. "Una decisione vergognosa", "una mortificazione insopportabile", "non so come possa uno Stato normale difendere le persone perbene".
  • Us vs. them. The clip sets "la gente perbene" and the police against "certe magistrature" and "queste decisioni".
  • “Visual proof”. A direct-to-camera address from the Prime Minister's own account, with no intermediary, presented as a personal statement of outrage.
  • Missing context. The clip links the Telegram channel to the riots without the fact that the channel was created on the evening of 18 October, after them.

Posted to Giorgia Meloni's own verified X account, the account of the sitting Prime Minister of Italy, and cross-posted to her other social channels the same day; agencies including ANSA and Agenzia Nova transcribed the remarks from it on 28 October 2026.

Bias

NoneSlightModerateStrong

Leans anti-judiciary / pro-government. The video is an explicit political attack by the prime minister on a specific judge's ruling, framing 'a certain magistracy' as an obstacle preventing the state from protecting law-abiding citizens, with no mention of the judge's stated reasons or the fact that Siher remains under investigation.

Bias describes how the post frames its message — the slant of the language, selection and emphasis — and is judged separately from whether the claim is true. A true claim can still be framed with a strong slant.

How we checked

52 s
  1. 1

    Ran searches on the arrest, the judge's decision and Meloni's "shameful decision" video in Italian.

  2. 2

    Compared how ANSA, Sky TG24, Il Post, Il Sole 24 Ore, Agenzia Nova and Corriere della Sera described the Milan judge's order and Siher's release.

  3. 3

    Checked the claim about the Telegram channel against L'Espresso's reporting on its creation time and Il Post's account of the release.

  4. 4

    Compared Meloni's video remarks with the word-for-word transcriptions published by ANSA and Agenzia Nova.

  5. 5

    Reviewed frames from the clip by eye for signs of manipulation, and noted that our automated media detector was not run because the clip's authenticity was not decisive to the verdict.

  6. 6

    Read the reporting on the Milan tribunal's and the magistrates' association's responses to the Prime Minister's statements.

✓ Claim checked✓ Media checked✓ Sources checked

Why 90% confidence

High

HIGH: the court ruling is corroborated by six independent outlets, and the false chronology is supported not only by a publication's reporting but by the prosecution's own case and by the speaker's later concession. The only element resting on a single outlet is the precise creation time, which is why this is HIGH rather than absolute.

Limits. We did not access the court order itself or the platform data behind the 19:58 creation time, and we ran no automated forensic check on the video because the clip's authenticity did not decide any of the verdicts.

What we don’t know

  • The full text and reasoning of the GIP's order, beyond what outlets reported.
  • The platform records behind the reported 19:58 creation time of the Telegram group.
  • Whether the Instagram page existed earlier than the Telegram group.
  • What exactly the Prime Minister meant by her correction, beyond the reported remark about the verb tense.

Spot it yourself

Find the overstatement

Looks suspicious, isn’t proof

  • The post comes from a political leader and is written to outrage. Partisan origin tells you to check harder, not that the content is false.
  • The caption is three words long — "Una decisione vergognosa" — with no detail. Short, heated captions are common in political communication and prove nothing.
  • The video is a selfie-style monologue with no graphics or documents shown. That is a normal format for a leader's social account.
  • You may disagree with the criticism of the judge. Disagreement with a claim's politics is not evidence that its facts are wrong.

The actual evidence

  • The court record: GIP Tiziana Landoni did not validate the arrest and ordered Siher's release, reported by ANSA, Sky TG24, Il Post and Agenzia Nova.
  • The timestamp: L'Espresso and Il Post both report the Telegram group was created at 19:58 on 18 October, after the events it is said to have caused.
  • The prosecution's own case: prosecutors did not hold Siher responsible for the 17-18 October disorders.
  • The speaker's own correction: La Stampa reported Meloni saying she had "got a verb tense wrong".
  • The judge's reasoning as reported by Corriere della Sera: the posts promoted protest, not violence.
  1. 1

    Separate the ruling from the commentary

    Ask what the post says happened, then find the court order or the reporting on it. If the ruling is real, the check moves to the sentences wrapped around it.

  2. 2

    Look for a timestamp on anything said to have caused an event

    Channels, pages and groups have creation dates. If a group was opened after the violence it is said to have provoked, the cause-and-effect claim collapses — here the reported time is 19:58 on 18 October.

  3. 3

    Check whether the prosecutors make the same link

    Read the account of the charges. If the indictment itself does not blame the accused for that weekend's unrest, be wary of anyone who does.

  4. 4

    Watch for shifting verb tenses

    "They led to" and "they had led to" are not the same claim. When a speaker later says they used the wrong tense, treat the original sentence as the thing to check.

  5. 5

    Look up how the institution responded

    Tribunals and judges' associations issue statements, and they are reported. The Milan tribunal calling the remarks "inadmissible" is the documented reaction, not the ruling itself.

Takeaway

A real event can carry a false explanation. When a post pairs a documented fact with a cause-and-effect story, check the sequence of events separately from the fact — a date or a creation time is often all it takes.

Questions people ask

Did the Milan judge really refuse to validate Youssef Siher's arrest?+

Yes. Judge Tiziana Landoni, as GIP in Milan, did not validate the arrest and rejected the prosecution's request for pre-trial detention, ordering Siher's release from San Vittore on 28 October 2026. ANSA, Sky TG24, Il Post, Il Sole 24 Ore, Agenzia Nova and Corriere della Sera all reported it.

Was the "Movimento 17 ottobre" Telegram channel created before or after the Milan riots?+

After. L'Espresso and Il Post report the group was created at 19:58 on Sunday 18 October 2026, once the 17 October march and that weekend's looting and devastation had already happened. A channel opened that evening could not have incited the earlier demonstrations.

Did Meloni admit she got the chronology wrong?+

La Stampa reported that, after a journalist pointed out the channel was opened only after the clashes, Meloni said she had "got a verb tense wrong" — she had said the demonstrations "led to" the devastation rather than "had led to" it. That is her own account of her wording.

Is a real video ever misinformation?+

Yes. Genuine footage can carry a false claim, and here the clip is authentic but one sentence reverses the order of events. Authenticity of the media and accuracy of the statement are separate questions, and each needs its own check.

What did the Milan tribunal and the magistrates' association say about Meloni's video?+

Per Il Sole 24 Ore, the president of the Milan tribunal and another senior judge called the statements "inadmissible". ANSA reported the magistrates' association describing the criticism as an "unbalanced attack" and a customary exercise of intimidation against judges.

Go deeper

GIP (giudice per le indagini preliminari)
The Italian judge who oversees the early, investigation stage of a criminal case and rules on matters such as whether an arrest should be validated.
Fermo
An Italian pre-trial measure under which a person is held on suspicion before a judge reviews whether the detention should stand.
Validation of arrest
The judge's review deciding whether a detention ordered in the investigation phase was lawful and may continue.
False context
A form of misinformation in which genuine content — a real video, photo or quote — is presented with a false setting, date or explanation.
ANM
The Associazione Nazionale Magistrati, the Italian association of judges and prosecutors, which issues public statements on attacks it sees as aimed at the judiciary.

People also search for

Meloni decisione vergognosa GIP Milano SiherMeloni video social arresto Youssef Siher Movimento 17 ottobreMovimento 17 ottobre canale Telegram creato dopo devastazioniMeloni "ho sbagliato il tempo di un verbo" SiherGIP Tiziana Landoni non convalida fermo Siher
For educators+
False context: genuine content placed in a false causal frameCorrelation and chronology: why a date can settle a causal claimAccusation versus conviction in legal reportingSpeech acts: separating a checkable factual claim from a value judgement
  • The video is genuine, and so is the ruling it criticises. Does that make posting it acceptable? Where does responsibility for accuracy sit when the speaker is a head of government?
  • The correction turned on a verb tense. How much can hinge on grammar in political language, and how would you explain that to someone who thinks it is a technicality?
  • How should a fact-checker treat a claim that mixes a documented fact, a false cause, and a political opinion in the same paragraph?

About this check

Platform
X
Posted by
@giorgiameloni
Posted
October 28, 2026
Age when checked
Older post, still live
Where it spread
Italy
Audience
UK & EU audience
Language
IT
Status
● Post is live
Verified
October 30, 2026, 15:13 UTC
Published
October 30, 2026, 15:13 UTC

Reach. Meloni video post 43,428 likes; Milan tribunal called government comments 'irricevibili'; ANM response; Pagella Politica explainer 29 Oct; Salvini post 1,974 likes

This verdict was generated with AI from the sources shown. AI can make mistakes — check the sources before relying on it.

Check anything yourself, in seconds.

Share any social post or video to What the Fact and get the verdict, the confidence, and the receipts.

Download on theApp StoreGet it onGoogle Play