← All fact checksMorning run · November 7, 2026 · #2 by reach
PoliticsEvent claimResurfaced

Did Abdul El-Sayed give his victory speech in Arabic and Ilhan Omar address her party in Somali?

Did Michigan Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed give his victory speech in Arabic, as The Free Press posted?

True, but…

Real speeches and a real Khamenei post — but 'in Arabic' overstates an English speech.

Mostly true. Abdul El-Sayed won Michigan's Senate seat and did use Arabic phrases — 'inshallah', 'alhamdulillah', 'JD, habibi' — though his Detroit speech was in English, not 'in Arabic'. Ilhan Omar did address her Minneapolis victory party in Somali. Aber Kawas won a New York State Senate seat, and Iran's Supreme Leader did post that America's collapse 'has accelerated'.

Likely genuine
The post as it circulated, labelled by our media check.Video · 2:25 · 1080×1920

Claims

✓ 7 true

Abdul El-Sayed gave his victory speech in Detroit in Arabic, addressing Americans in a foreign language.1

~ Partly trueCentral claimHigh confidence

The speech happened, and the Arabic in it is real. But the description of the whole address as given 'in Arabic' is an overstatement. The Associated Press, covering the Detroit victory speech, quotes El-Sayed saying 'JD, habibi' and promising that 'after JD swears me in in January, you can just go on and call me senator.' It also records his use of 'inshallah' — God willing — turned into 'alhamdulillah' — praise God — on the night. Those are phrases inside an English-language speech, several of which he translated himself, according to the video's own narration. That single AP report is our decisive evidence here: it is a wire service account quoting the speech directly, and it agrees with the video's own transcript, which shows him switching between languages rather than speaking only Arabic. Readers should weigh the difference between 'used Arabic' and 'spoke in Arabic' — it is small in wording and large in implication, because the video's argument depends on the idea that these lawmakers addressed the public in a foreign language.

Still open: We did not obtain a full transcript, so we cannot measure exactly how much of the speech was in Arabic.

Abdul El-Sayed is the first Muslim senator in American history and won the Michigan Senate race.1

✓ TrueHigh confidence

This is the plain fact the rest of the video is built on, and it holds. The Associated Press reports that El-Sayed defeated Republican Mike Rogers in Michigan and will become the first Muslim American to serve in the U.S. Senate. The video's narrator says the same thing on camera. Because this is a reported election result rather than an interpretation, it is the easiest item in the whole clip to check and the least contestable: either he won or he did not, and the wire service says he did. It also explains why the clip exists at all — a first of this kind is news, and news invites commentary. Nothing in the evidence contradicts the video on this point, and the video's later claims lean on it being true.

El-Sayed called J.D. Vance 'habibi' and told Trump he could call him 'senator'.1

✓ TrueHigh confidence

The AP quotes the speech directly: 'JD, habibi' and 'after JD swears me in in January, you can just go on and call me senator.' This matters for a specific reason. It is the line the commentary plays as its proof that an American politician addressed the country in Arabic. What the quote actually shows is a single term of endearment, used in a joking jab at the vice president, inside an otherwise English speech. The claim as stated is accurate; the use the video makes of it is where the stretch sits. One direct quote from a wire service settles the factual question, and it happens to undercut the larger framing at the same time.

Incumbent Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar addressed her victory party in Somali.6

✓ TrueHigh confidence

Here the video's wording is accurate without qualification. Reporting records that Omar, after winning Minnesota's 5th Congressional District with about 76 percent of the vote, spoke to her re-election party at Karmel Mall in Minneapolis and thanked voters in Somali. The footage the video inserts is credited to RT and matches those reports. Unlike the El-Sayed item, this is not a case of a few phrases inside an English speech — the Somali-language remarks are the thing being described. It is worth noting that we are relying on several outlets repeating the same account, including Fox News and the Daily Mail, rather than on one wire service alone, which strengthens the finding. That the remarks were in Somali is not disputed by anyone we found.

Aber Kawas became the first Palestinian elected in New York state.23

✓ TrueHigh confidence

Kawas won New York State Senate District 12 in Queens, and both CNN and Middle East Eye describe her as the first Palestinian American elected to the New York State Legislature, with Middle East Eye adding that she is the first hijab-wearing member. Two outlets with different editorial leanings reaching the same description is meaningfully stronger than one. The video's phrasing — 'first Palestinian elected in New York state' — tracks the reporting closely. This is a checkable electoral first, and it checks out. Readers should note that the video pairs this true fact with contested material about Kawas, which is why a real claim can sit in a misleading package.

Kawas suggested that 9/11 was a result of America's capitalism, racism, white supremacy and Islamophobia.7

~ Partly trueHigh confidence

The clip is real, and the words are close, but 'result of' is the video's paraphrase, not hers. In a 2017 Asian American Writers' Workshop panel she spoke of systems of 'capitalism and racism and White supremacy… and Islamophobia' as a 'long trajectory' and said 'we're just seeing the manifestations of that continuation, right, with 9/11.' She linked 9/11 to those forces as a manifestation. She rejects the 'America deserved it' reading, calling the resurfaced clips cherry-picked and saying she was responding to demands that Muslims apologise for the attacks. So the underlying footage is genuine and the summary is in the right neighbourhood, but the causal wording sharpens what she said. The strongest evidence here is the quoted transcript itself, reported by a partisan outlet, which is why we treat the wording as established but the characterisation as contested.

Still open: We did not view the full unedited panel footage, only the quoted excerpts.

Kawas has been photographed with a Hamas headband.9

– UnverifiableLow confidence

This is the weakest load-bearing item in the video and the one that most needs care. The allegation appears in partisan and activist sources — a PJ Media column and posts by an Israeli commentator — describing a headband with Arabic script as a 'Hamas headband'. We found no independent identification of the item, no confirmation of where or when a photo was taken, and no public response from Kawas in the sources we located. A description of an object by people already arguing a case is not the same as identifying that object. Readers should treat this as an unsupported assertion, not an established fact, and should notice that the video states it flatly, with no hedging and no attribution, in the middle of otherwise accurate material. One unverified claim sitting among true ones is a common pattern and a reason to slow down.

Still open: No image has been independently identified or dated, and Kawas has not publicly addressed the claim in the sources we found.

The Muslim Brotherhood's official website celebrated El-Sayed's primary win under the headline 'Abdul conquers the Zionists'.8

✓ Likely trueModerate confidence

Ikhwan Online, which its own X account describes as the Muslim Brotherhood's official website, published an article in August titled 'Abdul Rahman al-Sayyid conquers the Zionists and runs for the Senate' after El-Sayed's primary win over Haley Stevens. The reporting, however, originates with Republican and conservative outlets — an NRSC press release reprinting The Midwesterner, and the Free Beacon — and rests on a machine translation of the Arabic headline. That does not make it false; the article appears to exist, and the headline is quoted consistently. But it means the sourcing runs through one political direction, and no independent Arabic-language outlet we found confirmed the exact English rendering. We rate it likely true rather than true for that reason: credible, but not independently corroborated from a second direction. The precise wording in English is the part readers should hold loosely.

Still open: No independent Arabic-language confirmation of the exact English translation was located.

Iran's supreme leader posted that the process of America's collapse 'has accelerated'.45

✓ TrueHigh confidence

Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei posted 'The process of the US's collapse has accelerated' on 4 November 2026, the morning after the U.S. midterms, on an official English-language account on X. Fox News and The Guardian both quote the post, and reporting adds that he separately called the U.S. 'the Great Satan' and described its decline as irreversible. Two outlets from opposite sides of the political spectrum reproducing the same sentence is about as clean as corroboration gets for a social media post. The video's quotation is accurate. What the video adds is interpretation — that the timing is 'not a coincidence' — which is the presenter's inference, not something the post itself establishes.

Voters were frustrated by inflation, gas prices and the war in Iran.4

✓ TrueHigh confidence

This is the video's concession to the other side, and it is supported. Reporting after the midterms records record gasoline prices around $4.17 a gallon and heavy voter dissatisfaction with the eight-month war with Iran — a war Vice President JD Vance himself called the reason Republicans lost. The claim matters because it is the hinge on which the video's argument turns: the presenter accepts that voters had real grievances, then argues that electing these particular lawmakers is something different from ordinary frustration. The factual half of that hinge holds. The second half is opinion. Readers should notice how a clip can be scrupulous about background facts and still use them to steer a conclusion.

What was posted

X

A video commentary posted on X by The Free Press, in which a presenter speaks to camera and cuts to clips of three election-night speeches and a social media post. It asks viewers what to make of newly elected Muslim and Palestinian American lawmakers addressing supporters in Arabic and Somali, and links that to a post by Iran's Supreme Leader. The clip argues these lawmakers do not share 'American values'.

“Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed gave his victory speech in Arabic last night. Rep. Ilhan Omar addressed her victory party in Somali. And this morning, Iran's supreme leader posted that America's collapse "has accelerated." What should we make of these acceptance speeches?”

Posted on X by The Free Press account, captioned 'last night' and 'this morning', which places it around 5 November 2026, just after the midterms. The video credits its inserted footage to C-SPAN, RT and the Asian American Writers' Workshop.

Who posted it

X
@thefp

820K followers · Joined October 2022 · 4 years old

View the account on X ↗

Account check

Looks like a genuine account72%
Likelihood of automation4%

Estimates from public signals — account age, posting pattern, audience — not a judgement of the person behind the account, and separate from whether this post is true.

What stood out

  • @TheFP is the official X account of The Free Press, the Bari Weiss-founded media outlet now owned by Paramount Skydance/CBS News.
  • Account was created on 18 Oct 2022, making it about 4.1 years old, and has roughly 820K followers and ~29.9K posts.
  • Outside sources directly corroborate the account identity through thefp.com links, named staff, and official events; it is not an impersonator.
  • The account behaves like a real newsroom account: high but plausible posting volume, named reporters/editors, and editorial corrections.
  • Reliability caveats: Media Bias/Fact Check rates The Free Press Right-Center with Mixed factual reporting, and the outlet issued a correction on 6 Nov 2026 for a viral false claim about Abdul El-Sayed's victory speech.
  • Critics have flagged disputed coverage on Gaza and transgender issues, but this reflects editorial bias/accuracy concerns rather than automated inauthenticity.
  • No evidence of bot-like or coordinated inauthentic behaviour; the sparse supplied metadata is explained by missing profile fields, not suspicious account activity.
Signals (8)+
Approx post count
29900
Posting cadence
High, consistent with a newsroom account (roughly 20 posts/day)
Follower ratio
High; following count unavailable
Notable news coverage
Yes
Fact check history
Mixed; MBFC rates factual reporting Mixed; recent 6 Nov 2026 correction
Ownership
Paramount Skydance / CBS News
Organization type
Media outlet
Automation indicators
None found

Account checked November 7, 2026, 02:52 UTC

The media

Video
Likely genuinePresented as real footage

✓ What is genuine

The video itself is a real Free Press commentary, and the election-night footage it shows corresponds to events that independent outlets reported. The clips of El-Sayed, Omar and Kawas are genuine footage of real speeches, even where the narration around them overstates or slants.

The tells

  • ●●● Strong signal Presenter-to-camera commentary intercut with clearly credited third-party clips: C-SPAN for El-Sayed's Detroit speech, RT for Omar at Karmel Mall, and the Asian American Writers' Workshop for Kawas.our visual review
  • ●●○ Supporting signal El-Sayed's podium signage and crowd detail match reporting on the Detroit victory event.our visual review
  • ●●○ Supporting signal Lighting, skin texture, lip-sync and crowd detail stay consistent across keyframes, with no sign of compositing or face substitution.our visual review

Synthetic-media detector

Detector not consulted

The media is incidental to the claim; the detector was not needed.

How we checked the media

  • Reviewed the video's structure and its credited inserts by eye.
  • Compared the inserted footage against reporting on the speeches it shows.

Sources

9 sources reviewed

Further reading

  • 1Associated Press via U.S. News & World Report The full AP account of El-Sayed's speech and its Arabic phrases — the cleanest check on the 'in Arabic' wording.
  • 5The Guardian A Guardian report that independently quotes the Khamenei post, useful next to the Fox News version.
  • 3Middle East Eye Details on Kawas's win and her place in New York State political history.
  • 7Fox News Contains the verbatim 2017 panel quotes and Kawas's response that the clips were cherry-picked.

The full story

Democrats won both chambers in the November 2026 midterms, and a handful of results made history. In Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed beat Republican Mike Rogers and became the first Muslim American elected to the U.S. Senate. His Detroit victory speech mixed English with Arabic — 'inshallah' turned into 'alhamdulillah', and a jab at J.D. Vance as 'habibi' — and he translated some of it himself, per the AP. In Minneapolis, Ilhan Omar won a fifth House term and thanked her party in Somali. In Queens, Aber Kawas won New York State Senate District 12 and became the first Palestinian American in the state legislature.

The next morning, Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei posted that 'the process of the US's collapse has accelerated' — a sentence quoted by both Fox News and The Guardian. Voters, meanwhile, were angry about record gas prices and an eight-month war with Iran, which Vice President Vance called the reason his party lost.

That is the kernel the clip is built on, and it is substantial. The video does not invent an election result or a foreign leader's post. Its move is selection and emphasis: three genuine speeches are stitched into a single pattern, 'in Arabic' absorbed a speech that was mostly in English, and an unverified headband claim is dropped in beside facts that check out. The plausibility comes from the real history being real.

Kernel of truth

El-Sayed's Senate win, Omar's Somali remarks, Kawas's New York win and Khamenei's post are all genuine events from the 2026 midterms.

Timeline

  1. November 3, 2026

    U.S. midterms: El-Sayed wins Michigan's Senate seat, Omar wins a fifth House term, Kawas wins New York State Senate District 12. 1Associated Press via U.S. News & World Report

  2. November 3, 2026

    At her Minneapolis victory party at Karmel Mall, Omar thanks supporters in Somali. 6Daily Mail

  3. November 4, 2026

    Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei posts that 'the process of the US's collapse has accelerated'. 4Fox News

  4. November 5, 2026

    The Free Press posts its commentary video on X, referring to the speeches 'last night' and the Khamenei post 'this morning'.

How it was framed

Misleading contentFalse connection

The building blocks — the wins, the speeches, the Khamenei post — are real, but the video frames them as a single pattern of lawmakers addressing Americans 'in foreign languages', which overstates El-Sayed's mostly-English speech and folds in an unverified allegation. The facts are used selectively to steer a political conclusion rather than to inform.

  • Us vs. them. 'electing socialists and Islamists, people who don't share American values and want to completely change America into a different country'.
  • Ongoing-threat framing. 'This is like a long trajectory and we're just seeing the manifestations of that continuation' and the Khamenei post presented as 'not a coincidence'.
  • Selective evidence. Three speeches and one foreign post are stitched together, while the fact that El-Sayed's speech was largely in English is not stated.
  • Emotional language. 'conquers the Zionists', 'great Satan', 'want to completely change America'.
  • Missing context. The 'Hamas headband' line is stated without attribution, and Kawas's own response to the 9/11 clips is left out.

Posted on X by The Free Press, an outlet whose commentary the video presents, around 5 November 2026, shortly after the midterms. The video credits C-SPAN, RT and the Asian American Writers' Workshop for inserted footage. AllSides rates Fox News as Right; that rating is cited as the rater's, not ours.

Bias

NoneSlightModerateStrong

Leans right-wing / anti-Democrat, anti-Muslim framing. The commentary selects only Muslim and Arab-American Democrats, characterises them as 'socialists and Islamists' who 'don't share American values' and 'want to completely change America', and links them to the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran's leadership. The framing converts verified facts (victory speeches, a Khamenei post, past remarks) into a sweeping insinuation of disloyalty, with the presenter's rhetorical questions doing the argumentative work.

Bias describes how the post frames its message — the slant of the language, selection and emphasis — and is judged separately from whether the claim is true. A true claim can still be framed with a strong slant.

How we checked

1 min 30 s
  1. 1

    Searched for reporting on El-Sayed's Michigan win and his victory speech.

  2. 2

    Searched for reporting on Ilhan Omar's Somali-language victory remarks.

  3. 3

    Searched for reporting on Aber Kawas's New York State Senate win.

  4. 4

    Searched for the Khamenei 'collapse has accelerated' post.

  5. 5

    Searched for the 2017 Kawas 9/11 remarks and her response.

  6. 6

    Searched for the Ikhwan Online headline about El-Sayed's primary win.

  7. 7

    Reviewed the video's structure and credits by eye and compared its inserted footage against reporting on those events.

✓ Claim checked✓ Media checked✓ Sources checked

Why 78% confidence

High

We are confident in the headline because the core events — three election wins, three speeches, one foreign leader's post — are each confirmed by independent reporting, including outlets from opposite political directions on the Khamenei post. The band is not higher overall because two items weaken the picture: the 'in Arabic' description overstates an English speech, and the 'Hamas headband' allegation rests on partisan sources alone.

Limits. We did not obtain a full transcript of El-Sayed's speech, so we cannot say precisely what share of it was Arabic. We did not view the complete unedited 2017 Kawas panel footage, and we could not independently identify the headband in question. Our media assessment rests on visual review and reporting, not on a detector run.

What we don’t know

  • Exactly how much of El-Sayed's victory speech was delivered in Arabic.
  • Whether the headband in the circulated photo is what the video's sources call it, and where and when the photo was taken.
  • Whether the English rendering of the Ikhwan Online headline matches the original Arabic precisely.
  • Whether El-Sayed's remarks were translated by him throughout or only in parts.

Spot it yourself

Find the overstatement

Looks suspicious, isn’t proof

  • The presenter's alarmed tone and the words 'Islamists' and 'great Satan' are reasons to check the claims, not evidence that they are wrong.
  • The clip is a commentary segment on a partisan-leaning outlet, which tells you about its angle, not about whether the speeches happened.
  • The intercut footage is short and edited. Cutting is normal in commentary; it is what is said around the cuts that matters here.

The actual evidence

  • The AP's direct quotes from El-Sayed's speech — 'JD, habibi', 'inshallah', 'alhamdulillah' — show an English speech with Arabic phrases, not a speech 'in Arabic'.
  • Fox News and The Guardian, from opposite sides, quote the same Khamenei sentence, which settles that claim.
  • CNN and Middle East Eye both describe Kawas as the first Palestinian American in the New York State Legislature, so that fact stands.
  • The 'Hamas headband' claim traces only to a partisan column and an activist's posts, with no independent identification of the object.
  1. 1

    Separate the quote from the paraphrase

    Find the exact words a politician used. If a summary says 'result of' or 'addressed in Arabic', check whether the original says 'manifestation' or uses a few phrases inside another language.

  2. 2

    Ask what the speech actually was

    Look for a wire service account or full transcript that shows how much of the address was in which language, rather than a description of it.

  3. 3

    Check the foreign leader post against outlets on both sides

    If a Fox News report and a Guardian report quote the same sentence, the quotation is settled; the interpretation around it is not.

  4. 4

    Trace the most damaging allegation to its origin

    When a clip says someone was 'photographed with' something, find who identified the object and whether anyone independent confirmed it. If the only sources are already arguing a case, hold it as unverified.

  5. 5

    Notice what the clip leaves out

    Ask whether the person it targets was given their response. Kawas disputed the 9/11 reading; the video does not say so.

Takeaway

A post can be built almost entirely from true facts and still mislead you through what it overstates and what it omits. Check the strongest-sounding line against the original wording, and treat any dramatic allegation with no named source as unproven.

Questions people ask

Did Abdul El-Sayed really give his victory speech in Arabic?+

Not the whole speech. He spoke in English in Detroit after winning Michigan's Senate seat and used Arabic phrases, including 'inshallah', 'alhamdulillah' and 'JD, habibi', some of which he translated himself. The Associated Press quotes those phrases directly. Calling the address a speech 'in Arabic' overstates what happened, though the Arabic usage is real.

Did Ilhan Omar address her victory party in Somali?+

Yes. After winning Minnesota's 5th Congressional District with about 76 percent of the vote, Omar spoke at her re-election party at Karmel Mall in Minneapolis and thanked voters in Somali. Several outlets reported it, and footage of the remarks was widely shared. This part of the video is accurate as stated.

Did Iran's supreme leader say America's collapse has accelerated?+

Yes. Mojtaba Khamenei posted 'The process of the US's collapse has accelerated' on 4 November 2026, the morning after the U.S. midterms, on an official English-language account. Fox News and The Guardian both quote the same sentence. What the post means politically is a separate question from whether he wrote it.

Is it true Aber Kawas was photographed with a Hamas headband?+

We could not verify it. The claim appears in a partisan column and in posts by an activist commentator who described a headband with Arabic script as a 'Hamas headband'. No independent identification of the item was found, and Kawas has not publicly addressed it in the sources we located. Treat it as unproven.

How can a video be mostly true and still mislead?+

By choosing which true facts to combine and which to leave out. This clip uses real election results, real speeches and a real foreign post, then describes an English speech as 'in Arabic' and adds an unverified allegation. The accuracy of the parts makes the overall slant harder to notice.

Go deeper

Wire service
A news agency such as the Associated Press that supplies reporting to many outlets, so its account often reaches readers through several publications at once.
Cherry-picked
Describing clips or quotes selected to support one interpretation while leaving out material that would change how they read.
Framing
The way a story is angled — which facts are included, emphasised or left out — so that readers are steered toward a particular conclusion.
Inshallah / alhamdulillah
Arabic expressions meaning 'God willing' and 'praise God', used by Muslims in everyday speech as well as prayer.
Machine translation
Text converted from one language to another by software rather than a person, which can shift meaning or emphasis.
For educators+
Selective evidence and framingVerification versus plausibilitySource independence and one-sided sourcingThe difference between a paraphrase and a direct quote
  • The video's facts largely check out. At what point does accurate material become misleading — the wording, the selection, or the conclusion?
  • How would you check the claim that El-Sayed spoke 'in Arabic' if you only had the clip? What would you look for?
  • Why does an unverified allegation like the headband claim feel more convincing when it appears next to facts that are true?

About this check

Platform
X
Posted by
@thefp
Posted
November 5, 2026
Age when checked
Older post, still live
Where it spread
United States
Audience
US audience
Language
EN
Status
● Post is live
Verified
November 7, 2026, 02:54 UTC
Published
November 7, 2026, 02:54 UTC

Reach. 15,353 likes on original (syndication, 2026-11-07); Community Note; Free Press correction posted 2026-11-06 21:48Z, quoted by Greenwald, MeidasTouch, George Conway, Kyle Clark; Mediaite and Raw Story stories 2026-11-07

This verdict was generated with AI from the sources shown. AI can make mistakes — check the sources before relying on it.

Check anything yourself, in seconds.

Share any social post or video to What the Fact and get the verdict, the confidence, and the receipts.