Download
← All fact checksAfternoon run · November 10, 2026 · #6 by reach
SportsTechnologyAI-generated mediaResurfaced

Does Arda Güler lead Europe's top five leagues for chances created with 39?

Does a photo show Arda Güler leading Muslim Real Madrid players in prayer in the dressing room?

True, but…

The 39-chance lead holds; only the minutes and Yamal's tally shift with the data provider.

True, with small caveats. StatMuse's 2026-27 top-five-league table and reports from İdman.Biz, LiveScore/The Real Champs, A Haber and Indkast in early November 2026 all put Real Madrid's Arda Güler first with 39 chances created in 11 La Liga games. His minutes differ slightly by provider (654 vs 660), and Yamal's tally is disputed.

+3Sources ↓Original post ↗
Likely genuine
The post as it circulated, labelled by our media check.Image

Claims

✓ 4 true

Arda Güler (Real Madrid) tops the list of players who have created the most chances in Europe's five major leagues this season, with 39 chances.12456

“تصدّر النجم التركي أردا غولر، لاعب ريال مدريد، قائمة أكثر اللاعبين صناعةً للفرص في الدوريات الأوروبية الخمسة الكبرى هذا الموسم، برصيد 39 فرصة”

✓ TrueCentral claimHigh confidence

This is the claim the whole post rests on, and it holds. StatMuse's 2026-27 chances-created table for Europe's five major leagues lists Güler first with 39, across 11 league games. That figure is not a one-off: İdman.Biz, LiveScore/The Real Champs, A Haber and the Danish outlet Indkast all reported the same 39 in the first days of November 2026. Those outlets largely trace back to the same underlying dataset, so they are closer to one source repeated than four independent confirmations — but a live statistical table that anyone can check is a solid anchor regardless. The decisive point is that Güler's lead is the kind of number that can be verified by pulling up the table, not by trusting a screenshot. We found no competing figure anywhere in the record showing another player on more than 39. Readers should still note that 'chances created' is a provider-dependent statistic: the headline number is firm, but the margins around it can shift.

Giacomo Calò of Frosinone is second with 37 chances created.13

“وتفوّق غولر على جاكومو كالو، لاعب فروزينوني الإيطالي، الذي صنع 37 فرصة”

✓ Likely trueModerate confidence

Calò's second place matches StatMuse, which shows him on 37 chances across 10 games and 851 minutes — a heavier workload than Güler's, which is part of why the comparison is notable. The reason we mark this likely rather than certain is a provider gap: Planet Football's own earlier table had Calò on 30, because it counts key passes through a different supplier than StatMuse does. That is not a contradiction so much as two rulers measuring the same thing slightly differently. The post attributes the 37 to the Planet Football report, and Planet Football's methodology page does confirm it counts key passes, so the description of the metric is accurate. But the specific number 37 is best supported by StatMuse, not necessarily by the cited report at the moment it was published. A reader should treat Calò's ranking as reliable and his exact tally as approximate, dependent on whose definition of a chance you use.

Still open: Planet Football's live tally for Calò at the exact publication date could not be reconstructed.

Lamine Yamal (Barcelona) is third with 34 chances created.23

“ولامين يامال نجم برشلونة، صاحب المركز الثالث برصيد 34 فرصة”

– UnverifiableLow confidence

This is the weakest number in the post. StatMuse's table, published 2-3 November 2026, puts Yamal on 30 chances, not 34, and shows Iñigo Vicente on 32 — which would place Vicente, not Yamal, third. The post's 34 is consistent with Planet Football's own running key-pass count, where Yamal sat on 32 in a late-October update and could plausibly have reached 34 by early November. So the figure is not invented; it comes from a real provider. But we could not reproduce it against the source the post names at the moment it names it, and StatMuse tells a different story. We mark this unverifiable rather than false because a legitimate metric could produce 34. What this demonstrates is the central lesson of provider-dependent stats: two outlets can both be honest and still print different rankings for the same week. Readers should weigh Yamal's placement as the least firm of the three.

Still open: Which provider and snapshot date produced the 34 figure for Yamal could not be established.

The ranking is based on key passes (chances created) rather than assists.3

“وأوضح التقرير أن التصنيف يعتمد على التمريرات المفتاحية لا الحاسمة”

✓ TrueHigh confidence

This methodological point is exactly right and is the reason the rest of the post makes sense. Planet Football's chance-creator table states plainly that it counts key passes — the final pass before a team-mate shoots at goal — not assists. That is what 'chances created' means in football statistics, and it is why a player can top the list while having only three assists. The post deserves credit for spelling this out: it is the detail that separates a careful stat post from a misleading one. Many viral sports graphics quietly swap 'chances created' for 'assists' or vice versa, which changes who looks best. Here the metric is named accurately and matches the cited source's own methodology, so a reader who checks Planet Football will find the description holds. This is the strongest verified element of the post after the headline number, and it is what anchors the plausibility of the whole ranking.

Güler created his 39 chances in about 660 minutes, roughly one chance every 17 minutes, and has 3 assists.26

“أظهرت إحصاءات "FotMob" أن غولر صنع فرصه الـ39 خلال 660 دقيقة، بمعدل فرصة كل 17 دقيقة تقريباً، إلى جانب تسجيله 3 تمريرات حاسمة”

✓ Likely trueHigh confidence

The minutes differ slightly by provider, and the post is transparent about its source. StatMuse gives 654 minutes across 11 games and 9 starts; the post cites FotMob at 660. Both numbers produce the same headline rate — roughly one chance every 17 minutes — so the 'every 17 minutes' line survives whichever figure you use (654/39 and 660/39 both round to about 17). The three league assists are confirmed by İdman.Biz and other trackers, so the composite picture of a player creating chances at an unusually high rate in limited minutes is accurate. The small gap is a useful illustration of how harmless provider differences look like errors when you compare two sources side by side. Nothing here changes the story; the post even names its provider, which is more than most viral stat posts do.

Still open: FotMob's stored figure of 660 minutes at the exact publication moment could not be independently opened.

What was posted

Instagram

An Instagram post from TRT Arabi presents a sports photograph of Real Madrid's Arda Güler alongside a caption reporting that he leads Europe's five major leagues for chances created this season with 39. It ranks Frosinone's Giacomo Calò second on 37 and Barcelona's Lamine Yamal third on 34, citing a Planet Football report and FotMob figures, and adds a hashtag asking readers to engage for more updates.

“تصدّر النجم التركي أردا غولر، لاعب ريال مدريد، قائمة أكثر اللاعبين صناعةً للفرص في الدوريات الأوروبية الخمسة الكبرى هذا الموسم، برصيد 39 فرصة، وفق تقرير نشره موقع "Planet Football" البريطاني أمس الاثنين. وتفوّق غولر على جاكومو كالو، لاعب فروزينوني الإيطالي، الذي صنع 37 فرصة، ولامين يامال نجم برشلونة، صاحب المركز الثالث برصيد 34 فرصة. وأوضح التقرير أن التصنيف يعتمد على التمريرات المفتاحية لا الحاسمة، بينما أظهرت إحصاءات "FotMob" أن غولر صنع فرصه الـ39 خلال 660 دقيقة، بمعدل فرصة كل 17 دقيقة تقريباً، إلى جانب تسجيله 3 تمريرات حاسمة. #تفاعل ليصل إليك كل جديد”

“Turkish star Arda Güler, a Real Madrid player, tops the list of players who have created the most chances in Europe's five major leagues this season, with 39 chances, according to a report published by the British website Planet Football yesterday, Monday. Güler finished ahead of Giacomo Calò, the Frosinone player, who created 37 chances, and Barcelona star Lamine Yamal, third with 34 chances. The report explained that the ranking is based on key passes rather than assists, while FotMob statistics showed that Güler created his 39 chances in 660 minutes, at a rate of roughly one chance every 17 minutes, along with 3 assists. #Engage so everything new reaches you” — translated

Posted by the TRT Arabi Instagram account on 3 November 2026, the day after the Planet Football report it cites. The caption carries a hashtag prompting readers to engage with the post.

The media

Image
Likely genuinePresented as real footage

✓ What is genuine

The photograph is ordinary sports photography of Güler in a Real Madrid kit, cropped from a TRT broadcast or social graphic. It is illustrative and is not offered as evidence of the statistic.

The tells

  • ●●● Strong signal Real Madrid kit details — adidas logo, club crest, Emirates sponsor lettering — are internally consistent and correctly placed.our visual review
  • ●●○ Supporting signal A partially cropped broadcaster 'T' logo at the left edge shows the image was cut from a TRT graphic, consistent with a news outlet's own production.our visual review
  • ●●○ Supporting signal Hands, pose (pointing upward, hand on the crest) and blurred stadium crowd behind are consistent with genuine match photography, with no anatomical anomalies.our visual review

Synthetic-media detector

Detector not consulted

The media is incidental to the claim; the detector was not needed.

How we checked the media

  • Visual review of the photograph for anatomy, kit details, lighting and background consistency.
  • Comparison of the image against the described scene in TRT's own graphic framing.
  • We did not run an AI-generation detector: the photograph is illustrative, and our assessment of the claim rests on the statistical sources, not on the image.

Sources

6 sources reviewed

Further reading

  • 1StatMuse The primary live table behind the headline number, showing Güler, Calò and Yamal side by side.
  • 3Planet Football Planet Football's own chance-creator report, which confirms the key-pass methodology the post cites.
  • 2İdman.Biz Reporting that confirms the 39 figure, the 654-minute context and the three assists.

The full story

The kernel here is a real statistical table. In early November 2026, StatMuse's live chances-created table for Europe's five major leagues showed Arda Güler on 39 chances in 11 La Liga games. That number travelled quickly: İdman.Biz, LiveScore/The Real Champs, A Haber and the Danish outlet Indkast all reported the same 39 in the first days of the month, and TRT Arabi turned it into an Arabic-language Instagram post on 3 November, the day after the Planet Football report it cites.

The story got traction because it had two hooks that sports fans respond to. First, the rate: 39 chances in roughly 650 minutes means about one every 17 minutes, which is unusual output for a player who is not always a starter. Second, the comparison: a 21-year-old at Real Madrid out-creating Lamine Yamal of Barcelona is a ready-made talking point.

The post is more careful than most. It names the metric, key passes rather than assists, and it names two data providers, Planet Football and FotMob. That transparency explains why the numbers mostly hold up. What it also shows is how provider-dependent football stats are: StatMuse has Güler on 654 minutes and Yamal on 30, the post has 660 and 34, and neither is lying — they are counting from different feeds and snapshots. A claim can be broadly true and still have edges that move depending on who is holding the ruler.

Kernel of truth

Güler genuinely led Europe's five major leagues for chances created at the start of November 2026 with 39, a figure that holds across StatMuse and multiple outlets; the smaller figures around it vary by data provider.

Timeline

  1. November 2, 2026

    Planet Football publishes its chance-creators report for Europe's top five leagues, counting key passes; StatMuse-based reports put Güler on 39 chances. 3Planet Football

  2. November 2, 2026

    İdman.Biz and LiveScore/The Real Champs report Güler's 39 chances in 654 minutes, with Yamal on 30. 2İdman.Biz

  3. November 3, 2026

    TRT Arabi posts the Arabic-language Instagram claim citing Planet Football and FotMob, with Yamal on 34.

How it was framed

Accurate

The post's central statistic is corroborated by StatMuse and multiple outlets, and its description of the metric matches Planet Football's own methodology. The small differences on minutes and on Yamal's tally are provider-dependent variations, not deception. It is a broadly accurate statistical post, which is why we mark it TRUE_WITH_CAVEATS rather than a manipulation type.

  • Borrowed authority. The caption attributes the ranking to a British website's report and to FotMob statistics, naming both providers.
  • “Visual proof”. The photo of Güler in a Real Madrid kit is attached to a statistical claim, lending it an atmosphere of proof even though the image is illustrative.
  • Unsourced statistic. The post names Planet Football and FotMob but does not link to either; Yamal's 34 cannot be located in StatMuse.

Posted on Instagram by the verified TRT Arabi account on 3 November 2026. The caption cites a Planet Football report and FotMob figures and ends with a hashtag prompting readers to engage.

Bias

NoneSlightModerateStrong

Leans pro-Türkiye / promotional sports framing. TRT Arabi, Turkey's state broadcaster, is celebrating a Turkish international in glowing terms ('the Turkish star topped the list'), a mild promotional slant. The underlying numbers themselves are corroborated by independent statistical sources, so the slant does not distort the facts presented.

Bias describes how the post frames its message — the slant of the language, selection and emphasis — and is judged separately from whether the claim is true. A true claim can still be framed with a strong slant.

How we checked

1 min 13 s
  1. 1

    Searched for Arda Güler's 39-chance figure and Planet Football's report on Europe's top-five-league chance creators.

  2. 2

    Ran several targeted searches, including one for the 660-minute figure and one restricting results to Planet Football's own site.

  3. 3

    Read StatMuse's chances-created table for the 2026-27 season, plus reporting from İdman.Biz, LiveScore/The Real Champs, A Haber, Indkast and Planet Football.

  4. 4

    Compared the post's numbers against each provider and noted where they diverge.

  5. 5

    Reviewed the attached photograph visually for kit details, anatomy and cropping.

  6. 6

    Did not run an AI-generation detector, because the photograph is illustrative and the claim does not depend on it.

✓ Claim checked✓ Media checked✓ Sources checked

Why 75% confidence

Moderate

We set the headline at MODERATE even though the central claim is HIGH: the core number, 39, is well corroborated by a checkable table and multiple outlets, but the Yamal figure is unverifiable and the minutes differ. That mix of one solid statistic and one shaky detail fits TRUE_BUT better than a clean TRUE.

Limits. We could not open FotMob's stored figure of 660 minutes or Planet Football's table at its exact publication snapshot. Both providers change their data, so these figures can no longer be reproduced exactly.

What we don’t know

  • Where the 34 figure for Yamal comes from and at what moment it would have been accurate.
  • Whether FotMob's minutes total was 660 at publication or shifted later.
  • Whether Planet Football's table at the exact publication date matched StatMuse's 37 for Calò.

Spot it yourself

Find the overstatement

Looks suspicious, isn’t proof

  • A partisan-leaning broadcaster sharing a stat that flatters one of its home-country players — a reason to check, not evidence of a lie.
  • The sports-photo-with-caption format, which looks like a meme and can carry anything.
  • An engaging hashtag asking for likes and comments, which is normal social-media practice.

The actual evidence

  • StatMuse's live table puts Güler first on 39 chances in 11 games — the headline number checks out.
  • Four separate outlets published the same 39 in early November 2026.
  • Planet Football's methodology page confirms the ranking counts key passes, exactly as the post states.
  • Güler's three league assists are confirmed; the 'every 17 minutes' rate holds whether you use 654 or 660 minutes.
  • Yamal's 34 does not appear in StatMuse, which has him on 30 and Iñigo Vicente on 32.
  1. 1

    Find the primary table, not the screenshot

    Search for the provider's own live stats page — here, StatMuse's chances-created table — and read the current numbers directly.

  2. 2

    Check the metric

    Open the cited source's methodology and confirm what it counts: key passes or assists. 'Chances created' is usually key passes, which is not the same as assists.

  3. 3

    Compare the named providers

    If a post cites two providers for different figures, expect small differences. Note which number comes from which source.

  4. 4

    Test whether your totals match

    For Yamal, StatMuse's 30 versus the post's 34 shows that one ranking cannot be verified against the named source. Treat that line as approximate.

  5. 5

    Ignore the picture, check the number

    A real match photo proves only that the player exists. The figure behind it is the thing to verify.

Takeaway

Football 'chances created' figures move with the data provider, so a stat can be broadly true and still print different rankings in different outlets. Always find the provider's own table and name the metric before treating a ranking as settled.

Questions people ask

Does Arda Güler really lead Europe's top five leagues for chances created?+

Yes. StatMuse's 2026-27 table puts Güler first with 39 chances in 11 La Liga games, and İdman.Biz, LiveScore/The Real Champs, A Haber and Indkast all reported the same 39 in early November 2026. The headline number is solid.

Is the photo in the TRT Arabi post real?+

It is an ordinary sports photograph of Güler in a Real Madrid kit, showing the crest and a blurred stadium crowd. A cropped broadcaster 'T' logo at the left edge suggests it was cut from a TRT graphic. It is illustrative, not evidence of the statistic, so it doesn't change the verdict.

Why does the post say Yamal has 34 chances when StatMuse says 30?+

Different providers count key passes differently. The post cites Planet Football, whose own running tally had Yamal on 32 in late October, so 34 is plausible. StatMuse has Yamal on 30 and Iñigo Vicente on 32. Both could be honest; the ranking shifts with whoever is counting.

What does 'chances created' mean — is it the same as assists?+

No. Chances created usually counts key passes, the final pass before a team-mate shoots, whether or not a goal follows. Assists count only passes that lead directly to goals. That is why Güler can top the chances list with only three assists.

Why did WTF rate this TRUE_BUT instead of fully TRUE?+

Because the core statistic holds but the supporting details vary by provider. Yamal's 34 could not be reproduced in StatMuse, and the minutes differ (654 vs 660). Those are small, provider-dependent differences, not deception, but they are worth flagging.

Go deeper

Key pass
The final pass before a team-mate takes a shot, whether or not a goal results.
Chances created
A statistic that usually counts key passes, used to measure how many shooting opportunities a player sets up.
Data provider
A company or service that compiles football statistics; different providers can publish slightly different numbers for the same matches.
Assist
A pass that leads directly to a goal, as opposed to a chance that is missed.
Live table
A frequently updated public statistics page, such as StatMuse, that shows current season figures.

People also search for

Arda Güler 39 chances createdأردا غولر 39 فرصةmost chances created Europe top five leagues 2026-27Güler Calò Yamal key passes rankingPlanet Football chance creators Guler top
For educators+
Provider-dependent statistics: how the same real event yields different numbers depending on methodology and data feed.Key passes versus assists: distinguishing statistical terms that look interchangeable but aren't.How accurate content circulates with minor distortion, and how to separate the headline from the supporting detail.
  • If a post's headline number checks out but one supporting figure cannot be verified, how much should that affect your trust in the post?
  • Why might two data providers give different rankings for the same week, and how would you decide which to cite?
  • What signals in a social post tell you the image is illustrative rather than evidence — and why does that distinction matter?

About this check

Platform
Instagram
Posted
November 3, 2026
Age when checked
Older post, still live
Where it spread
Spain, TR, LB
Audience
International audience
Language
AR
Status
● Post is live
Verified
November 10, 2026, 14:54 UTC
Published
November 10, 2026, 14:54 UTC

Reach. Annahar: 'several million views' on one X account in recent hours (X post URL not in article HTML)

This verdict was generated with AI from the sources shown. AI can make mistakes — check the sources before relying on it.

Check anything yourself, in seconds.

Share any social post or video to What the Fact and get the verdict, the confidence, and the receipts.

Download on theApp StoreGet it onGoogle Play