Did Susan Collins vote five times to continue the Iran War?
Did Susan Collins vote five times to continue the Iran war while she and her husband hold up to $100,000 in oil and gas stock?
True, but…
Collins voted against efforts to limit the Iran War, but her financial ties are less straightforward.
Susan Collins voted against measures to end the Iran War five times, a fact supported by several news reports. However, claims about her oil stock holdings are imprecise, as they may exceed the stated amount. The statements mix verified facts with some partisan framing.
GenuineClaims
✓ 1 trueSusan Collins voted to continue the Iran War five times (i.e., she voted against measures that would have ended or limited the war on five separate Senate roll calls).123
Troy Jackson's assertion about Susan Collins voting against efforts to end military action in Iran on five occasions is backed by credible reports from several news outlets. These documents track the series of Senate roll calls where Collins opposed various measures presented by Democrats to limit the conflict. Detailed accounts specify that she voted against attempts to limit military actions on five specific votes, especially during the early phases of the escalation in 2026, aligning with public reports from sources like PolitiFact and the Bangor Daily News.
She and her husband hold up to $100,000 in oil and gas stock.245
While public disclosures indicate that Thomas Daffron, Collins' husband, possesses stock in major oil companies—including ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66—the claim that they hold 'up to $100,000' in total stock is misleading. Individual holdings fall within specified ranges that could justify that phrasing for certain stocks, but the overall reported exposure exceeds that figure, with estimates suggesting their combined holdings might be between $115,000 and $150,000. Therefore, while there is some accuracy in the description, it lacks precision as a comprehensive total.
While gas and heating prices go up, she's getting richer (i.e., Collins/the household profited as prices rose because of the war).24
The assertion that Collins profited due to rising energy prices is an opinion rather than a fact supported by direct evidence. While Collins' family held substantial stocks in oil companies whose values can correlate with energy price surges, the claim suggests a direct causal link, implying motivation based on profit, which is not substantiated by the evidence. The economic effects of the conflict are complex and cannot be neatly distilled to an interpretation that one person's voting record equates to direct financial gain without further proof.
What was posted
XTroy Jackson stated on Twitter that Susan Collins voted to continue the Iran War five times and holds substantial oil and gas stock, suggesting she profits as prices rise.
“Susan Collins voted to continue the Iran War five times. That’s five times she’s betrayed Mainers to benefit her own bottom line. She and her husband hold up to $100,000 in oil and gas stock. So while our prices go up, she's getting richer.”
Who posted it
XAccount check
Estimates from public signals — account age, posting pattern, audience — not a judgement of the person behind the account, and separate from whether this post is true.
What stood out
- Troy Jackson is a fifth-generation logger from Allagash, Maine, and a former President of the Maine Senate, representing Senate District 1 from 2016 to 2024. (repbio.org)
- In July 2026, Jackson was selected as the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Maine, replacing Graham Platner, who suspended his campaign amid a sexual assault allegation. (thedailybeast.com)
- Jackson's campaign has received endorsements from prominent figures, including former President Barack Obama, who praised him as a 'blue-collar champion' in the Maine Senate race. (thedailybeast.com)
- His son, Chace Jackson, registered as the Maine Maritime Academy's 'legislative coordinator' in 2024, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. (politifact.com)
- Jackson has been involved in labor activism and has a history of strong support for workers' rights, aligning with his campaign's focus on economic issues. (jacksonformaine.com)
Signals (4)+
- Posting cadence
- Unknown
- Follower ratio
- Unknown
- Notable news coverage
- Yes
- Fact check history
- Yes
Account checked October 9, 2026, 15:34 UTC
The media
Video✓ What is genuine
The video features Troy Jackson making remarks during a live debate about Susan Collins' voting track record.
Synthetic-media detector
Detector not consultedThe media is incidental to the claim; the detector was not needed.
How we checked the media
- Verified that the video is from a local broadcast of the debate with identifiable branding.
- Cross-examined timestamps and show evidence of the debate occurring as presented.
- Corroborated claims made in the clip with other independent reports of the same event.
Sources
5 sources reviewed- 1Live fact-checking Susan Collins and Troy Jackson in second debate for U.S. Senate in Maine ↗
PolitiFact · politifact.comPrimary / fact-checkerIFCN signatory (Poynter)Evidence
Documents the context and details of the Collins–Jackson debate along with verification.
- 2Fact‑checking 6 claims that dominated the Susan Collins‑Troy Jackson debate ↗
Bangor Daily News · bangordailynews.comUntiereduntiered — treated as signal only, never decisiveEvidence
Summarizes Collins' voting pattern linked to the Iran conflict and offers contextual insights.
- 3CNN debate excerpt / transcript (Jackson quote) ↗
CNN (transcript) · prod.transcripts.cnn.comLow reliabilityBORDERLINE B/C — reporting w/ strong bias tag; opinion is CEvidence
Provides a transcript of statements made during the debate that directly relates to the claims.
- 4Vulnerable GOP Maine Senator Susan Collins Begs for Gas Money After Upholding Trump’s War ↗
The Daily Beast · thedailybeast.comUntiereduntiered — treated as signal only, never decisiveEvidence
Details on Collins' financial disclosures, showing investment interests.
- 5Susan Collins failed to report up to $395,000 in stock trades ↗
American Journal News · americanjournalnews.comUntiereduntiered — treated as signal only, never decisiveEvidence
Analyzes Collins' past financial filings, giving further perspective on her reported stock holdings.
Further reading
- 1PolitiFact PolitiFact's assessment provides detailed context on the debate and claims made.
- 2Bangor Daily News The Bangor Daily News offers localized insights and clarifications on Collins' voting decisions.
- 4The Daily Beast The Daily Beast examines Collins' financial interests and the political implications.
The full story
During the escalation of the U.S.-Iran conflict in 2026, Congress held multiple votes regarding military action, highlighting a divide between Democratic efforts to limit actions and the Republican majority. Senator Susan Collins' voting record indicated she consistently opposed efforts to end or limit military action, documented in reporting from local and national outlets. The specific pattern of votes referred to by Troy Jackson—five instances of voting against Democrat-led initiatives—involves a complex web of procedural maneuverings that suggest political alignment rather than direct financial motivation. Meanwhile, Collins and her husband Thomas Daffron's financial disclosures demonstrate holdings in several energy companies, raising questions about whether these investments are coincidentally profitable amid rising gas prices. While Jackson's insinuation of unethical behavior offers a narrative, it lacks direct evidence linking votes explicitly to personal gain.
How it was framed
The claims blend factual voting history with partisan framing, creating an impression of unethical behavior without definitive evidence of a causal connection.
- Emotional language. The claim uses strong language, portraying Collins as a betrayer.
- Us vs. them. It implies a dichotomy between Collins' financial interests and the welfare of Mainers.
Bias
Leans anti-Collins / pro-Jackson. The post comes from Troy Jackson (Collins’ opponent) and frames factual items in a partisan attack ('betrayed Mainers to benefit her own bottom line'), so it is strongly slanted toward a campaign/attack narrative.
Bias describes how the post frames its message — the slant of the language, selection and emphasis — and is judged separately from whether the claim is true. A true claim can still be framed with a strong slant.
How we checked
1 min 12 s- 1
Conducted searches for Susan Collins' voting history on recent Senate roll calls specific to the Iran conflict.
- 2
Reviewed media outlet reports that clearly document the voting patterns and details of Collins' disclosures.
- 3
Examined video footage from credible local broadcasts showing the context of Jackson's statements.
- 4
Compared findings with various fact-checking sources for corroboration of claims.
✓ Claim checked✓ Media checked✓ Sources checked
Why 80% confidence
HighWe consider our confidence high due to the corroboration of claims from multiple independent channels that confirm both the voting pattern and stock holdings.
Limits. We could not definitively establish a direct causal relationship between Collins' financial interests and her voting behavior.
What we don’t know
- Whether Collins' voting record was influenced by external pressures or interests.
- The potential impacts of ongoing global conflicts on local politicians' financial standings.
- How public sentiment around these issues may shift leading up to the elections.
Spot it yourself
Find the overstatementLooks suspicious, isn’t proof
- Partisan source may bias interpretation of events.
- The emotional tone in Jackson's statements can heighten suspicions.
- The claim makes broad assertions that might be overreaches based on limited specifics.
The actual evidence
- The documented voting record of Collins regarding military action matches Jackson's claims.
- Public financial disclosures confirm some holdings in energy sectors.
- News reporting provides aggregate assessments of stock values.
- 1
Check the voting record from official governmental sources.
Look for Senate roll call records that show how each senator voted.
- 2
Examine financial disclosure filings available to the public.
Search for financial documents which outline asset holdings of politicians and their families.
- 3
Review independent fact-check reports on similar claims.
Seek out analyses from organizations known for impartial verification.
- 4
Identify the language used in claims for signs of bias.
Assess how language choice might affect interpretation.
Takeaway
When evaluating political claims, it’s essential to separate verified facts from emotional framing and interpretations. Always look for primary source documentation and trusted analyses.
Questions people ask
What were the specific votes Collins made regarding the Iran War?+
Collins voted against several Democrat-led efforts to limit or end U.S. military action in Iran, with key moments during specific roll calls in 2026.
Is there direct evidence that Collins profited from the ongoing conflict?+
While her family holds stocks in oil companies, the claim that she voted to personally profit is merely speculation without direct evidence.
What are the implications of politicians holding stock in oil companies?+
Politicians holding stock in industries they regulate can lead to perceived conflicts of interest, raising ethical questions about their voting behavior.
How can fact-checkers determine the truth of political claims?+
Fact-checkers compare statements against documented records, independent news reports, and utilize reliable sources to corroborate claims.
What role do emotional language and framing play in political discourse?+
Emotional language can draw attention and sway opinion, often blurring the lines between facts and interpretations in political claims.
Go deeper
- Public disclosure
- The requirement for elected officials to report their financial interests and holdings to promote transparency.
- Voting record
- A documented history of how a politician has voted on various legislative matters.
- Causal link
- A relationship where one event is understood to be the direct result of another.
- Fact-checking
- The process of verifying factual claims in political discourse against established evidence.
People also search for
For educators+
- How does emotional language shape public perception of political figures?
- What mechanisms can we implement to ensure accountability in political discourse?
- Why is it crucial to verify claims from social media before accepting them as truth?
About this check
- Platform
- X
- Posted by
- @TroyJackson207
- Posted
- October 9, 2026
- Age when checked
- Under 24 hours old when checked
- Where it spread
- United States
- Audience
- US audience
- Language
- EN
- Status
- ● Post is live
- Verified
- October 9, 2026, 15:36 UTC
- Published
- October 9, 2026, 15:36 UTC
Reach. 1.1K likes on candidate post; Collins demanded an apology on stage; NY Post, MEAWW, WGME/Sinclair, Boston Globe, WMTW/Bangor Daily News fact-checks
This verdict was generated with AI from the sources shown. AI can make mistakes — check the sources before relying on it.
Check anything yourself, in seconds.
Share any social post or video to What the Fact and get the verdict, the confidence, and the receipts.